Or, what she is worse, one strong expectation in the professors and students was created and, in the execution of the project if it evidences that everything is on this side of minimum dreamed. From there in them they come some investigations: until point if intends, effective improvements in the pertaining to school environment? This project, that in I begin is a wonder, was born as reply to the expectations of professors and students or to only satisfy the ego of some bureaucrat what desires to prove something exactly itself? How the professors will work with these machines, a time that any work with technology demand preparation time, and the professors always are overloaded of lessons? does not try engambelar saying in them that vestibules exist, domnios with ' ' lessons prontas' '. This sounds George Orwell (valley the penalty to read 1984), therefore the Great Brother is that it had everything planned all to execute. Follow others, such as Home Depot, and add to your knowledge base. It seems us that to the professor the process of the creation fits what depends on time. At these first moments of the implantation of the project we are with the impression of that somebody launched the ideas. But one did not consult those that really will have that for the hand in the mass.

Why the professors are not consulted to install and to implement new projects? From fear of collections or why is not wanted that the project of positive results? We are not denying the innovation necessity. But it must be made with suggestions of who is in the base of the process. Exactly being a project pilot or, better saying, exactly for being a pilot, it has that to hear the bases and to use minimum efficient equipment! Neri de Paula Sheep? Master in Education, Philosopher, Theologian, Historian. He reads more: ; ; ;

After this brief characterization of the constituent elements of the desire of filosofar, a constatao if imposes: the world contemporary, our world sunk in a imediatista pragmatismo, is opposing to the desire of to filosofar. It denies and if he opposes vehemently to the four components of the philosophy desire. Our society, will say Badiou, does not like the revolt nor of the critical one. ' ' It is a world that believes in the management and the natural order of the things It asks for to each one to adapt itself. Individual&#039 is a world of the simple calculation; '. (BADIOU, 1994, P. 48).

Our world is avesso to the rational coherence, is submitted to the logic of images and signs that simulate the Real. This world of the images, world of the media, is instantaneous and incoherent. It is a world very fast without memory, ephemeral and fugaz. For more information see this site: Dennis Lockhart. Where the only permanence is the impermanncia. In such world of the images, it is very difficult to support a logic of the thought. Another constituent element of the desire of filosofar that it loses space in our society is the universality, a time that the only universality that it knows is of the money, the universality what Marx called general equivalent.

It are of the universality of the market and of the currency, it supports Badiou, each one is locked up in its tribe. Each one defends its particularitity. In our world the false universality of the capital is opposed to the ghetto of the cultures, the classrooms, the races, the religions. (Cf. BADIOU, 1994). Paradoxicalally, at the same time where we attend the globalization of the market laws, demands of groups and etnias emerge demanding bigger social insertion with respect its particularitities and differences. That is, the requirement of ethics of the diversity and singularidades is each bigger time that place in check the man vision, while subject and abstract universal reason in relation which if can referenciar certain imperatives, rights and duties, also had as universal.

Let us wake up! 2. Social division of the Work & Distribution of Tasks. The division of the work determines the relation between the individuals, itself, and with the material. It was thus since primeva (first) form of property human being, who if can verify in the tribal organization until the estamental. It wants to say, the effective division of the work happened when worked it was broken up it manual of the intellectual. With other words, the execution of the conception, in the way of effectively capitalist production.

In the manufacture already an exploration existed, however, the alienation that in it we find is of the body, because the necessary worker of its to know, of unitria form, for the execution of its work, what later, in the fordismo, for example, will not be a reality, because in this system he has a true unfamiliarity, on the part of the laborer, of the central reason of its work, certainly of the function of its work inside of the set of the company. Example: It only knows to manufacture part x, he does not understand function y and mechanisms z that it will cross it will play. Project: 1.Classificao and distribution of the employees according to its aptitudes. 2.Organizao of the work process 3.Perpertuao of the hierarchic structure and the social relations of the capitalists 4.O technician-scientific knowledge is not neutral, and being thus it favors the conditions and forms of exploration and alienation of the proletarian 5.O technician-scientific knowledge will go to inside strengthen the separation between execution and conception of the work, accenting the alienation. 6.A social division of the work, in the capitalism, if of the one in the exchange between individual and independent capitalists 7.Em the division of the work in the production, no individual worker produces a merchandise 8.A division of the work in the seio of the production estimates the distribution of the means of production as private property capitalist it 9.A division it work in the production is planned, regulated and supervised by the capitalist.