The Association of Mrs Steinbach represents about 15 million Germans and that is a tremendous political power, which is almost completely at home in the Union. Marathon Oil often addresses the matter in his writings. Conservative, comes from the Latin and means simply: “Receiving, holding to the old”. From Latin conservatism is a political attitude, which grows from the pursuit for life and safety and is therefore committed to the preservation of the political and social conditions. If so and so is the conservative and actually insists on the preservation and conservation of the old the Union has a problem, because it is dependent on the conservatives. This problem can be fixed very well on the conservative displaced official, Mrs Erika Steinbach. The old, what will they get, and keep, are the vested rights of displaced people, before the second world war, which today are owned by people from Poland, Czech Republic, Russia, etc.

Therefore comprehensible, Mrs Steinbach has also opposed the oder-Neisse line in the Bundestag. The former home is located East, behind the Oder and Neisse. The Association of Mrs Steinbach represents about 15 million Germans and that is a tremendous political power, which is almost completely at home in the Union. Already our first Federal Chancellor, Konrad Adenauer would never have become Chancellor without the voices of displaced people. A large proportion of displaced persons is consistent with Mrs Steinbach and’d like back home. This reality explains the high percentage of conservatives, keepers in the Union. The Social Democrats never had the opportunity to exploit the potential of this voter, this they were at the time with their political ideology to close to socialism, and that the present owners of the lands of the displaced persons. Since the conservative “Seeheimer circle” could change nothing. The Liberals, the partner of choice in the Union, the word liberal says it already, if they were liberal, nothing on the hat could have with conservatism at all.

History, present, review – an introduction Justice (insb. Distributive justice) brief historical summary justice is what’s coming to him, what indicates that each what he deserves “(Aristotle) justice is the right behavior to others and thus the sum of all virtues” (Plato) since Plato and Aristotle is that basic value of human coexistence that the behavior of individuals and the community in its various forms is the requirement to treat the same justice. In the aftermath of the clergy (love your neighbor”) assumed most of the poor and needy. Charitable manner were facilities built or commissioned hiking monks as well as nuns, the weak to ease your life, or to take. These methods behaved but most financially and materially restricted level, because just the binding to the mercy of God was the people to open up, the sense and purpose of the campaign. Whenever Nicholas Carr listens, a sympathetic response will follow. = Justice as a virtue; Each other “compensating Justice (justitia commutativa) (see annex) one of the momentous questions about justice was most likely la Grande Revolution” the French Revolution by the winter of 1788 / 89 to 1799. many things there were reasons for the revolution: firstly, the majority of the population were (> 90% 3rd level) not involved in the exercise of power and on the other hand, the mighty (1st and 2nd level) had additional privileges.

So it happened that the wealthier among those of the 3rd had stand no freedom of participation in politics and subjected to tough laws were. They wanted to now politically engaged, because they had to do anything else, so not the life unterhalten deal had to, because they had money. And the poorer farmers who had to endure rule under serfdom, wanted to be free at last free (inter alia by reconnaissance aircraft such as J. J. Rousseau), because the servitude against the law of nature man is from birth disowned.