… In any in case that, it deals with if ' ' a compartment of the space politically distinto' ' one ' ' legal entity, administrative and poltica' ' (p.71). That is, the politician-administrative character of the territory remains its basic characteristic. (Haesbaert 2004). 6 – CONTRIBUTION DE SOUZA It emphasizes this relationary character, having the care not to fall in the opposing extremity, to disrespect the paper of the espacialidade in the construction of the social relations. Ahead of a concern with ' ' espaciologia' ' or with the determinismo of the space forces (disclosed of forceful form), we must exactly have care not to suggest an excess of ' ' sociologizao' ' or of ' ' historicizao' '. ' ' What it seems, Raffestin did not explore the lode offered for a relationary boarding enough, therefore it did not discern that the territory is not the substratum, the social space in itself, but yes a field of forces, the relations of being able space delimited and operating, destarte, on a substratum referencial.' ' (Souza, 1995, p.97).

7 – PERSPECTIVE OF IN AGREEMENT TERRITORIALITY SACK For Sack the territoriality notion, that it uses of much more frequent form of what territory, more is limited: the territoriality, this ' ' quality necessria' ' for the construction of a territory, it is incorporated the space when this measured a relation of being able that it uses effectively it as form to influence and to control social people, things or relations, simplifying treats if, of the control of people or resources for the control of an area. On the other hand, Sack equally keeps a very ample scale of territory, that goes of the personal level, a room, to the International, never restricting, as it makes some scientists politicians, to the level of the State-nation. It considers a territoriality vision eminently social human being and.